Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Lien de réinitialisation envoyé
| Blogs > Freeonereturns > Mon Blog |
Could It Be?
|
Could It Be? I watched President Trump last night making his point on the need for the wall and other support item at our southern border. Nothing was said that I didn’t know already and I’m in agreement with him. But knowing that Chuck and Nancy was going to follow him with their lies why didn’t someone come up with what seemed so natural to me? After he made his statement but while still on the air he should of drawn attention to a TV or screen of sorts where he plays all the fucks (Chuck, Nancy, Biden, Hillary and even Obama saying why we need to stop illegals from crossing the border with any means etc.. The tapes are out there and I even seen them once again yesterday before Trump went on. As for the shutdown, nobody has gone without a check yet. The first comes Friday so they can come to agreement today and all’s well. So I ask, could it be I’m smarter then all the talking heads in D.C.? Not that Chuck and Nancy were convincing but following their own words how ridiculous whould they have looked. Would CNN and the majors stop showing Trump before he signed off? All the sweeter as that would of been all over TV today. Showing them all what the fucks they are. |
|||
|
Great point!!!! You're right, they've all stated that. Obama even deported many, many illegals during his 6 years in OUR White House!
| ||
|
| ||
|
It's a shame that we the people are once again being controlled by New York and California (Chuck and Nancy). To these two power hungry Dems we are just fly over states ( and citizens ).
| ||
|
If you look back in the Democratic archives you'll see that the Democrats have been in favor of better security on the Southern Border, and have been for decades and decades. Only now that President Trump actually wants to get it done... the Dems get all squirrely and stonewall-ish. Which is funny, because the Dems have said the same thing.. but never really did anything about it. Ha.. Chuck and Nancy...geez they should be retired .
| ||
|
Uh huh ... the pattern repeats itself... take for instance these passages from Confucius written a couple thousand years ago ... “I transmit but do not innovate,” he said. What he sought to transmit were the rites, music and poetry that had prevailed in a time, semi-mythical perhaps, when rites, music and poetry — primarily the poetry preserved in the “Book of Odes,” originating in the golden age and expressing the innocence to which Confucius aspired — in effect ruled, because sage-kings like King Wen, King Wu and the Duke of Chou, the dynastic founders, were virtuous and wise. “When those above are given to the observance of the rites,” Confucius taught, “the common people will be easy to command.” Force is unnecessary. Law is superfluous. “There was nothing for him to do,” said Confucius of the ruler of a state in which the Way of the sage-kings prevailed, “but to hold himself in a respectful posture and to face due south” in accord with the traditions of ancient cosmology. Legge noted ... In China, the emperor sits facing the south. So did the princes of the states in their several courts in Confucius’ time. An explanation of the practice is attempted in the Yih-King. “The diagram Le conveys the idea of brightness, when all things are exhibited to one another. It is the diagram of the south. The custom of the sages (i. e. monarchs) to sit with their faces to the south, and listen to the representations of the empire, governing towards the bright region, was taken from this.” 2. Observe, Chung-kung was the designation of Yen Yung, see V. iv. 3. Of Tsze-sang Pih-tsze, we know nothing certain but what is here stated. Choo He seems to be wrong in approving the identification of him with a Tsze-sang Hoo.—“To dwell in respect,” to have the mind imbued with it. So the eternal pattern repeats itself and those that wish that culture replicates itself in such a manner hold to the rites and promote the notion that the emperor is really an emperor and not just some replacement, a stand in ... what's another word for that ... a trump. Trumping those not paying attention to the moment. Recursion ... re/cursive ... repetition ... can drown out the recapitulation of the past. For as Orwell put it "He who controls the present controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future." And so how is the present controlled ... well Marshall McLuhan put it like this: "It is Possible to deal with the whole environment as a work of art" ... "The task confronting contemporary man is to live with the hidden ground of his activities as familiarly as our literate predecessors lived with the figure minus the ground." ... "Language always preserves a play or figure/ground relation between experience, perception and it's replay in expression" ..."schizophrenia may be a necessary consequence of literacy" ... "there ain't no grammatical errors in a non-literate society." ... "I wouldn't have seen it if I didn't believe it." I look at trump and I just don't see any context to what he is talking about that isn't transgressive heavy handed propaganda. I saw Ralph Nader once when was on tour ... he said that the two parties are two sides of the same coin ... we have 4-8 years of an instigator followed by 4-8 years of soother. So going further on this modern take of the Tao ... yin and yang in their greater and lesser interplay. Confucians represents the transmission of the Tao as it is in culture, while the Tao Te Ching represents the Tao as it is exists in nature. The Supposedly venerable Lao Tzu has been translated about as many times as the bible ... yet going back to the earliest translations the violence shines through ... from the 1800s "The sage makes his way through the Tao by the torch of light and chaos, but I also use this stick." Ordo ab chao ... the notion of right versus left is but a dialectic method of controlling the populace via divide and conquer. Of course reading this blog I see that the dems (Simile dims) and liberal minded folks are named 'the Left' is capitalized. Which if I were more literate would interpret as a pronoun generalizable to all those on the other side. That would be crazy reading there ... So um ... thanks for reading ... if you didn't ... thanks for lying about it. I coulda gone on about walls and blind spots on the geospatial spatiation of thought and the representation of self, but I got bored ... also this is about ideas and not persons ... Peace and love ... hugs.
| ||
|
300,000 .... what is your source for that number? other than ancient china or the Berlin wall ... what country has a border like you describe? If the reader is to take you as meaning a steel or concrete wall along the southern border between these two countries ... in as flat and materialistic as possible ... and not as a metaphor for describing the reader or the writer as in a relationship where the wall would create a superimposition or blind. If you mean as a metaphor then ... I will take no reply as an answer. Messages are fine too. What I posted above was more of a 'huh ... that ancient Chinese point of view advocated by Confucians - is damn near the same dialectic of Left versus Right .. Good V Bad, Up V Down ... as is being used in today's politics. I'm not gonna dive into political discourse because while all that exists out in the world ... the world has an impact upon the person viewing it and ... the world can be seen as a work of art ...especially without fact checking. So to the Blog owner ... no I'm not gonna haunt your 'other than sex and swinging political' blog ... I was just like 'hmm ... thinks that make a person go hmm. Personally neither the left or right have the correct answer ... but they both seek to be seen as having the right answer in order to rite their efforts toward other goals that everyone seems to want to willfully ignore.
|
Devenez un membre pour ajouter vos commentaires sur ce blog
